Purpose/Significance The paper studies the co-fund patterns and effectiveness of research fund from the perspective of organization types, and provides theoretical reference for improving medical research funding system in China.Method/Process It takes the field of cervical cancer research as an example, dividing research funds into 5 types:government funds, academic funds, enterprise funds, medical institution funds, and social organization funds. The effectiveness of co-funding is studied based on journal impact index(JII), annual citation index(ACI), annual usage index(AUI) and comprehensive effectiveness score, and pattern recognition and analysis are carried out based on the indicator results.Result/Conclusion The comprehensive effectiveness score of co-funding by universities, enterprises, and social organizations is the highest. Research funding in the medical field can be based on specific research goals and combined multiple funds to achieve overlapping effects and improving the effectiveness of output results.