生成式医学人工智能的伦理治理:三维协同路径与中国实践
作者:
作者单位:

(1.神州医疗科技股份有限公司 北京 100080;2.广东医科大学生物医学工程学院 东莞 524023;3.华中农业大学外国语学院 武汉 430070;4.厦门大学医学院 厦门 361102;5.福州大学附属省立医院数智中心 厦门 350001;6.南方医科大学南方医院赣州医院 赣州 341000)

作者简介:

弓孟春,博士,特聘研究员,发表论文40余篇;李雨杭,本科生,发表论文1篇;通信作者:戴辉,教授;#对本文有相同贡献。〔基金项目〕 国家重点研发计划项目(项目编号:2023YFC2706305)。

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R-058 〔文献标识码〕A

基金项目:

国家重点研发计划项目(项目编号:2023YFC2706305)。


Ethical Governance of Generative Medical Artificial Intelligence:a Three-dimensional Collaborative Pathway and Chinese Practices
Author:
Affiliation:

(1.Digital Health China Technologies Ltd.,Beijing 100080,China;2.School of Biomedical Engineering, Guangdong Medical University, Dongguan 524023, China;3.College of Foreign Languages, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China;4.School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, China;5.Digital Intelligence Center, Fujian Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Fuzhou University, Xiamen 350001, China;6.Ganzhou Hospital of Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Ganzhou 341000, China)

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • 图/表
  • 访问统计
  • 参考文献
  • 相似文献
  • 引证文献
  • 资源附件
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的/意义 构建适配中国医疗场景的生成式医学人工智能(generative medical artificial intelligence, GMAI)伦理治理体系,为推动医疗 AI 高质量发展提供理论支撑与实践参考。方法/过程 基于中国医疗体系、数据生态及文化特点,对比中外GMAI治理场景差异;从技术、制度、社会3维度构建协同治理框架,结合患者、医生、技术平台等多主体责任分析,细化联邦学习、分级监管、伦理沙盒等关键实践路径。结果/结论 提出“技术安全保障-制度动态规制-社会多元共治”的GMAI临床伦理三维协同治理方案,回应了中国场景下GMAI治理的特殊性需求,为全球医疗 AI 伦理治理提供可借鉴的中国实践经验。

    Abstract:

    Purpose/Significance To construct an ethical governance system of generative medical artificial intelligence (GMAI) that is adapted to the healthcare context in China, and to provide theoretical support and practical references for promoting the high-quality development of medical AI.Method/Process Based on the characteristics of the healthcare system, data ecosystem, and cultural context in China, the differences in GMAI governance scenarios between China and other countries are compared. A three-dimensional collaborative governance framework (technology, institution, and society) is established. Combined with a detailed analysis of the responsibilities of multiple stakeholders including patients, physicians, and technology platforms, key practical pathways such as federated learning, hierarchical supervision, and ethical sandboxes are elaborated. Result/Conclusion A three-dimensional collaborative governance scheme for GMAI clinical ethics is proposed:technological security guarantee, dynamic institutional regulation, multi-stakeholder social governance. This scheme effectively responds to the specific needs of GMAI governance in the Chinese context and provides replicable Chinese practices for global medical AI ethical governance.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

弓孟春,李雨杭,马永慧,等.生成式医学人工智能的伦理治理:三维协同路径与中国实践[J].医学信息学杂志,2026,47(1):2-8, 23

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:2025-11-14
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-02-26
  • 出版日期:

扫码关注

官方微信